“Hearables” as the complement to Smart Glasses

“Your eyes can deceive you, don’t trust them.”

Obi-Wan Kenobi in Star Wars: A New Hope (aka “Star Wars”)

Today I tweeted about a Sony “neckband speaker” and joked that maybe I’d make a sequel post to my wearables blog post of a few weeks ago.

And so here we are!

Digging into this Sony product a bit (the SRS-NS7), I found a preceding wearable audio unit released by Sony in July, the SRS-NB10. This product was positioned as “the Ultimate Work-From-Home Companion” in the press release for the product. It’s a true wearable device–looking like a kind of weighted scarf–that allows the user to listen to audio (music, podcasts, etc.) and participate in calls all while sauntering freely around. The difference from wireless headphones is that the user will apparently not be blocking out the outside world, as these don’t cover the ears, they rest on the shoulders.

“The NB10 is optimized for personal sound so the user can hear their virtual meetings and phone calls clearly, without disturbing others in the room. Thanks to a full-range speaker unit angled upwards and a passive radiator to boost the bass, every call features incredible audio clarity. “

Now hold onto your 21st century hats kids, because I’m literally going draw a thread back some 40 years to a product I remember being marketed when I was a little kid: the Bone Fone (a name that’s extremely unfortunate if not somewhat hilarious.)

The Bone Fone was a device that looked like a weighted scarf and was meant to allow the user to listen to music while not disturbing those around through some sort of bone vibrating induction technology. Sound familiar?! This was first marketed back in 1979… 1979!!!

And this archival news clip actually seems to purport that it worked. 

I saw someone selling one of these at a Jamaica Plain garage sale 20 years ago when I was in grad school (my first grad school!) and I still kick myself for not shelling out the $5 to buy it, if only as a curio.

Going back to my original tweet, Sony’s latest wearable device is meant to provide a spatial audio experience with support for Dolby Atmos, which is basically the latest surround sound enhancement that provides sounds from above instead of just around and behind. My only experience with Dolby Atmos is with Amazon’s Echo Studio home speaker which has some speakers that shoot up to the ceiling and bounce off. I tried out some of the Dolby Atmos-enabled programming on Amazon and it’s actually pretty nifty, so I don’t think it’s necessarily all smoke and mirrors but I wonder about the feasibility of wearing a heavy digital scarf around the house.

However, wearing small earbuds is a completely different thing and I can attest from observing my 13 year old that many people wear AirPods all the time. I purposely didn’t state many “young” people but I will admit there does seem to be a generational gap with that approach for someone like me. I’m used to actively wearing headphones to listen to something (music, video call, podcast, etc.) and then removing them when I’m done, but I definitely know that many people wear devices like AirPods all the time.

And in fact, a few years back when AirPods Pro emerged, some started noting that they offered insights into Apple’s strategy with regard to wearables and augmented reality – a concept driven home by the portmanteau “hearables” (which I first noted in this 2017 piece by Andrew Murphy titled “AirPods: The First Mass Market Hearable”.)

In a follow-up post two years later, Murphy outlines some real out-of-the-box type ideas of what Audio Augmented Reality could entail, musing about shared location based stories or audio experiences, amongst other ideas. One key aspect of shifting between this audio augmented layer is the Transparency Mode of AirPods, which essentially drops any noise cancelling to allow sounds from the real world to be heard. It’s akin to dropping the graphic overlay from a set of smart glasses.

Since the adoption rate of ear-based wearables like AirPods is way ahead of the curve for visual wearables like the RayBan Facebook glasses that I posted about a few weeks ago, I actually think audio AR could be the entry point for mainstream adoption of AR. There’s so much to consider with regard to the user experience of an audio driven augmented reality type of space that I will continue that in my next post, in which I will wrap up my trilogy of wearable blog posts in thrilling fashion!










  1. I also think today’s market would accept audio AR over visual AR. Why? I’m not quite sure…I guess consumers are more comfortable with hearing innovation because we have been exposed to so much change in the last century (think back to the horrible Panasonic headphones from the 2000s).

    This would be a great class discussion. Maybe you should tweet a poll to get it started? “Would you buy wearable visual AR or audio AR first?”

  2. Nice thorough post. I took the dive into Airpods pro back at the start of the pandemic. I do like them a lot, and can find myself wearing them after my meetings etc just out of habit. Not all day though.

  3. I never really know where I fall on the wearables front. I love my air pods and even the new apple ones that go over the head. My concern with anything that projects noise not directly into the ear is that people CAN hear it. Like tomorrow morning on my flight I would be crushed if someone played music out loud when im sitting so close. Additionally, I think the wearable products will face a tougher challenge from a security standpoint as more people take meetings remotely, is a speaker playing into the air really confidential?

  4. cloudbasedbrett · ·

    I think we briefly talked about the Bose sunglasses that play music. I have tried these on and I have been with someone who has worn them right next to me. I understand that they are sunglasses, but if we can put that aside for a second and think about their form in another form…I was blown away by the sound quality, and I was even further impressed that no one could hear the music I was listening to nor could I hear what someone else was listening to when they had them on. This could have many benefits for me. One for example, I like to run outdoors. One thing with road running is keeping your situational awareness about you. With these glasses, or this type of technology, you can keep your SA without losing the ability to listen to music or podcast/audio book. Very interesting capability and usage. I’d love see more about where this technology could infiltrate the market.

  5. I think there is definitely a future for wearables like this, especially in a wfh environment. The biggest issue I see with Sony’s neckband speaker is the cost. $300 is a lot to spend for a product you’ve never tried and other products already do the job well. If they are to make them more mobile and active, like how Brett said for running, I think they can be worth the $300 price tag. Until then I think it is nice as a concept but will need more to be able to take off.

  6. rjperrault3BCCGSOM · ·

    I could see this being helpful for hearing impaired people. My father in law who I would say is not quite hearing impaired yet but still loves to listen to television at a ridiculous volume. Drives me crazy sometimes lol. But with this technology I could essentially bring the volume closer to him while I enjoyed at a more reasonable volume.

  7. kaylacyrs · ·

    Very interesting post – honestly at first my reaction was what is the point of this we already have AirPods? But after reading other comments I do think it could have a potential use for certain markets. I think this should be marketed towards an older generation who may not have adopted wireless headphones but could be used in their everyday lives. This reminds me a little bit of a jacket I got for christmas when I was in elementary school that had headphones in the hood- it never really worked…

%d bloggers like this: